OpenPilot

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
There is no ideal category for openpilot these are the closest, science was the other one i considered http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html

There is no ideal category for openpilot these are the closest, science was the other one i considered http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html

I haven't been receiving email updates and I've haven't had time to do anything with this. I should have time to get back to it shortly.

I haven't been receiving email updates and I've haven't had time to do anything with this. I should have time to get back to it shortly.

We might want to get input from the more marketing minded people dor the Comment and Categories...

We might want to get input from the more marketing minded people dor the Comment and Categories...

OP-1901 Adding support for SRXL in connection diagram.

Merge remote-tracking branch 'temp/laurent/OP-1901_revonano1505_SRXL_wizard_artwork' into thread/OP-1901_SRXL_Wizard

OP-1901 Adding support for SRXL in vehicle wizard.

OP-1901 Revonano1505 SRXL wizard artwork

OP-1901 Multiplex SRXL on Flexi port

OP-1879 remove openpilot hardcoding: part 2: packaging
OP-1879 remove openpilot hardcoding: part 2: packaging
REVONANO WhatsNew Update

Release 15.05 RC5 updated notes on changes

Merge branch 'abeck/nano-rc4-fixes' into rel-nano-15.05

Merge branch 'samguns/OP-xxxx_Remove_PWM_RX_while_use_OneShot' into abeck/nano-rc4-fixes

REVONANO Truely disarm on pathfollower guidance alarm

whats the status on this?

whats the status on this?

REVONANO 1. Sanity check for PWMSync & OneShot while using PWM receiver. 2. Remove CC in hwsettings.xml

agreed. I'll have to make a new branch based on your rel-15-rc4 to fix that

agreed. I'll have to make a new branch based on your rel-15-rc4 to fix that

thanks https://reviews.openpilot.org/static/nngxkj/2static/images/wiki/icons/emoticons/smile.gif I did not expect the spanish inquis... ehm the callback https://reviews.openpilot.org/static/nngxkj/...

thanks I did not expect the spanish inquis... ehm the callback

agreed, as discussed - I'll rebase this on your RC4 branch once merged, which removed those and have a better abort scenario

agreed, as discussed - I'll rebase this on your RC4 branch once merged, which removed those and have a better abort scenario

Hmm ok we shouldn't have to duplicate this code in plans and here....so maybe it should be moved to the controller

Hmm ok we shouldn't have to duplicate this code in plans and here....so maybe it should be moved to the controller

we can't do this

we can't do this

This code now runs at 20ms, is never used by path planner right? It really was to implement the manual command side of initiation. I don't think this really should be here. It complicates the contr...

This code now runs at 20ms, is never used by path planner right? It really was to implement the manual command side of initiation. I don't think this really should be here. It complicates the controller.

yes it is happening in loat PIDControlDown::GetDownCommand(void) { PIDStatusData pidStatus; float ulow = mMinThrust; float uhigh = mMaxThrust; if (mCallback) { mCallback->BoundThrust(ulow, uhigh);

yes it is happening in loat PIDControlDown::GetDownCommand(void)
{
PIDStatusData pidStatus;
float ulow = mMinThrust;
float uhigh = mMaxThrust;

if (mCallback) {
mCallback->BoundThrust(ulow, uhigh);

But we should not do this

But we should not do this